Skip to contents

This bibliography contains all peer-reviewed publications linked to WATLAS

The .bib file containing the full bibliography in BibTeX can be downloaded here.

Introduction

Tracking animal movement is crucial for understanding interactions with changing environments and predicting the effects of anthropogenic activities, particularly in ecologically significant areas like the Wadden Sea. The WATLAS system (Wadden Sea Advanced Tracking and Localisation of Animals in real life Systems) enables high-resolution monitoring of small bird movements, offering insights into space use, individual variation, and social networks, thereby supporting research and conservation efforts in the region. A detailed description of WATLAS can be found in Bijleveld et al. (2022).

In Nathan et al. (2022) we discuss how big-data approaches, such as high-throughput tracking with WATLAS, can lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Particularly that advances in high-throughput wildlife tracking systems now allow more thorough investigation of variation among individuals and species across space and time, the nature of biological interactions, and behavioral responses to the environment.

Prologue to WATLAS

ATLAS builds on and is inspired by ‘Time Of Arrival’-tracking developed by MacCurdy & Richard M. Gabrielson (2009). This tracking method is described in MacCurdy et al. (2018) that also includes a pilot study in the Wadden Sea as a ‘proof of concept’. After these initial tests in 2008-2009, this pre-WATLAS TOA-system was deployed in the Wadden Sea with 15 receivers studying red knot habitat use. After much trial and error, we could show in Bijleveld et al. (2016) how red knots selected habitat to maximise their energy intake rates. They did, however, not select areas with the highest density of prey but trade-off prey quantity and quality. Moreover, individuals differed in how they leaned towards quantity or quality of prey in selecting mudflat habitat.

After the success in the Wadden Sea, we also deployed TOA-tracking in Mauritania. Where we studied xx and showed habitat use was independent of gizzard mass.

Consistent with previous empirical studies, patch residence times in the field were positively correlated with gizzard mass. The slope of this correlation, as well as the observed range of patch residence times, was in accordance with the simulated values. The 12 birds with reduced gizzard masses did not decrease patch residence times in response to the reduction in gizzard mass. * These findings suggest that diet preferences can indeed cause the observed among-individual variation in gizzard mass and patch residence times.

Compared with Banc d’Arguin, resource patches in the Wadden Sea were larger and the maximum local resource abundance was higher. However, because of constraints set by digestive capacity, the average potential intake rates by red knots were similar at the two study sites. Space-use patterns differed as predicted from these differences in resource landscapes. Whereas foraging red knots in the Wadden Sea roamed the mudflats in high aggregation without site fidelity (i.e. grouping nomads), at Banc d’Arguin they showed less aggregation but were strongly site-faithful (i.e. solitary residents).

As part of a broader review on circadian rhythms, we reveal individual differences in tidal and circadian foraging rhythms of red knots REF.

Validation

Validation of methods is crucial for understanding the strengths and limitations. In Beardsworth et al. (2022) we tested the accuracy and precision of WATLAS using concurrent GPS measurements as a reference. The median accuracy of WATLAS was 4 m compared with GPS localizations. Localizations that were collected by more receiver stations were more accurate. The three-receiver localizations provided an accuracy of 10 m, which increased to 3 m with seven receivers contributing to the localization. Applying Filter-Smoothing on the data further increased the accuracy to 6 m for three-receiver localizations and to 2 m for seven-receiver localizations.

Methods

A pipeline with coding examples for cleaning (e.g. Filter-Smoothing) high-throughput tracking data with atlastools (tools4watlas builds on atlastools) is presented in Gupte et al. (2022).

In Toledo et al. (2022) we describe our tags and particulary the design of these versatile, widely-applicable, and field-proven ‘Vildehaye’ tags for wildlife sensing and radio tracking. Also, we discuss longevity of tags and show that WATLAS tags with a CR2032 battery transmitting at 6 s can last 226 days.

Ecology

Migration, relocation and departure decisions

We studied the environmental conditions that red knots selected for relocation flights across the North Sea to the United Kingdom in Gobbens et al. (2024). Approximately 37% of tagged red knots departed yearly and on average did so a few hours after sunset, 4h before high tide, with tailwinds, and little cloud cover.

Habitat use

Red knots foraging on the thick-shelled cockles, that are swallowed whole, needed to trade-off quantity and quality of their prey. In Bijleveld et al. (2016) we show how they, therefore, select habitat with intermediate prey densities to maximise energy intake rates. Other shorebirds, do select for highest desnities where prey are easiliy discovered. In Penning et al. (in prep) we show how Sanderling select habitat with the highest desnities of shrimp.

Individual variation

In Ersoy et al. (2022) we showed that foraging tactics and diet are associated with the personality trait exploration, independent of morphological differences. WATLAS was used to locate tagged individuals on mudflats for detailed behavioural observations.

Following this result, in Ersoy et al. (2024) we studied the development of consistent exploration behaviour and found that juvenile red knots had a more diverse diet than adults and had less consistent personalites. We discuss a pathway how early foraging experiences could shape development of exploratory personalities. WATLAS was used to show how juvenile red knots differed in habitat use, which is presented in the appendix.

Bibliography

Beardsworth, C. E., Gobbens, E., Maarseveen, F. van, Denissen, B., Dekinga, A., Nathan, R., Toledo, S., & Bijleveld, A. I. (2022). Validating ATLAS: A regional-scale high-throughput tracking system. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(9), 1990–2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13913
Bijleveld, A. I., Maarseveen, F. van, Denissen, B., Dekinga, A., Penning, E., Ersoy, S., Gupte, P. R., Monte, L. de, Horn, J. ten, Bom, R. A., et al. (2022). WATLAS: High-throughput and real-time tracking of many small birds in the dutch wadden sea. Animal Biotelemetry, 10(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-022-00307-w
Bijleveld, A. I., MacCurdy, R. B., Chan, Y.-C., Penning, E., Gabrielson, R. M., Cluderay, J., Spaulding, E. L., Dekinga, A., Holthuijsen, S., Horn, J. ten, Brugge, M., Gils, J. A. van, Winkler, D. W., & Piersma, T. (2016). Understanding spatial distributions: Negative density-dependence in prey causes predators to trade-off prey quantity with quality [Journal Article]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1828), 20151557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1557
Ersoy, S., Beardsworth, C. E., Dekinga, A., Meer, M. T. J. van der, Piersma, T., Groothuis, T. G. G., & Bijleveld, A. I. (2022). Exploration speed in captivity predicts foraging tactics and diet in free-living red knots. Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13632
Ersoy, S., Beardsworth, C. E., Duran, E., van der Meer, M. T. J., Piersma, T., Groothuis, T. G. G., & Bijleveld, A. I. (2024). Pathway for personality development: Juvenile red knots vary more in diet and exploratory behaviour than adults. Animal Behaviour, 208, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.11.018
Gobbens, E., Beardsworth, C. E., Dekinga, A., Horn, J. ten, Toledo, S., Nathan, R., & Bijleveld, A. I. (2024). Environmental factors influencing red knot (calidris canutus islandica) departure times of relocation flights within the non-breeding period. Ecology and Evolution, 14(3), e10954. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10954
Gupte, P. R., Beardsworth, C. E., Spiegel, O., Lourie, E., Toledo, S., Nathan, R., & Bijleveld, A. I. (2022). A guide to pre-processing high-throughput animal tracking data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(2), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13610
MacCurdy, R. B., Bijleveld, A. I., Gabrielson, R. M., & Cortopassi, K. A. (2018). Automated wildlife radio tracking. In Handbook of position location (pp. 1219–1261). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119434610.ch33
MacCurdy, R. B., & Richard M. Gabrielson, A. P., Eric Spaulding. (2009). Automatic animal tracking using matched filters and time difference of arrival. Journal of Communications, 4, 487–495. https://doi.org/doi:10.4304/jcm.4.7.487-495
Nathan, R., Monk, C. T., Arlinghaus, R., Adam, T., Alós, J., Assaf, M., Baktoft, H., Beardsworth, C. E., Bertram, M. G., Bijleveld, A. I., Brodin, T., Brooks, J. L., Campos-Candela, A., Cooke, S. J., Gjelland, K. Ø., Gupte, P. R., Harel, R., Hellström, G., Jeltsch, F., … Jarić, I. (2022). Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Science, 375(6582), eabg1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg1780
Toledo, S., Mendel, S., Levi, A., Vortman, Y., Ullmann, W., Scherer, L.-R., Pufelski, J., Maarseveen, F. van, Denissen, B., Bijleveld, A., Orchan, Y., Bartan, Y., Margalit, S., Talmon, I., & Nathan, R. (2022). Vildehaye: A family of versatile, widely-applicable, and field-proven lightweight wildlife tracking and sensing tags. 2022 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPSN54338.2022.00008